Thursday, November 28, 2019

This is how to execute an idea better than anyone else

This is how to execute an idea better than anyone elseThis is how to execute an idea better than anyone elseGoogle, Amazon, and Apple have become iconic because each of these companies completely disrupted an entire industry. And then they dominated it. And now Amazon and Apple will soon be the first companies on the planet ever valued at a trillion dollars.Before there welches Google, there was search. Before the iPod, there were plenty of MP3 players on the market. And elektronischer geschftsverkehr existed before Amazon. But each of these companies took an existing idea to the next level by doing it better through the hard work of execution.Thats because true neuerung is hard. You cant just start creating things and then hope yur widget will solve a market-moving problem. Sure, Steve Jobs had a knack for knowing what customers needed even before they did- but hes the exception, not the rule.More often than not, you need to hold your idea up to critique and make sure its durable. Y ou have to be relentless in search of data to disprove your hypothesis and if your idea survives, you may be onto something.Too often, we fall in love with our ideas and take shortcuts in our path to market. For example, perhaps we do some, but not all, of the data collection and essential planning needed before diving head first into pitching our idea to others. Or, worse, maybe we just decide to go to market quickly in the service of failing fast or creating buzz. This is definitely one path. But the risks of these shortcuts are obvious- and there are ways to minimize these risks before jumping in.Regardless of the industry, converting an idea into a successful product depends on four thingsReally understand your customers pain pointsHold your idea up to critique, early and oftenConceptualize the simplest solution possible to eliminate the pain pointsEat the Frog FirstIf your idea emerges from this gauntlet with strength, youve probably saved yourself (and your investors) A LOT of time and money.But identifying a worthy problem and relentlessly refining it is more of a challenge than most people think. Its hard to know how many failed business ideas could have prospered with more work on the front end to get it right, or to better understand their customer.Why did Facebook beat out MySpace when MySpace was there first? How did Amazon turn e-commerce into something no one else could envision, despite the same raw materials available to others back in 1994? How did Netflix come out of nowhere to unseat Blockbuster? The winners in each category better understood their customers needs, were open to rethinking the original market solution, could envision how technology would evolve to support their vision, and then executed against a plan that took them to the next level.In order to do the same, here are the steps you need to take as an innovator1. Look for the pain points, and youll find the opportunitiesIve always been interested in industries that have a direc t, positive and enduring impact on health.At Good Start Genetics, we wanted to bring new delivery methods to genetic testing. At the time, online tests in most categories were transactional in nature need a test, order a test, pay for it- and the company moves onto the next customer. We wanted to do more and do it in a way that best approximated the kind of care and support youd receive at the doctor in a traditional environment.Our main business was genetic testing services for fertility clinic patients. We helped couples understand whether they were carriers of certain genetic mutations that might be passed onto offspring. Our services were sold in the traditional way, with salespeople visiting clinicians and setting up accounts that we would service through orders from brick-and-mortar clients.The questions we asked ourselves, and the pain points we searched for, ranged from wondering how many couples were not getting screened, to how many werent aware of their genetic testing op tions to begin with. From there, we asked how many could actually afford these services, and if there was a way for us to help democratize this kind of testing, and do so in a way that went beyond the transactional nature of other testing services on the market at the time.2. Hold your idea up to critique, early and oftenIn order to ensure our ideas had merit, we discussed them often with clinical advisors, fertility doctors, investors, and market research analysts.We presented our hypotheses to everyone who would listen and asked about the flaws in our thinking where could we go wrong, how do we best ensure patient care, how might our online consumer business fit with our clinical business and whether one might cannibalize the other? Throughout this process, we learned that key areas of our plan would need to be reworked before launch, and we took the time to rethink and restructure accordingly.For example, we learned that offering genetic counseling online to only those patients w ho were positive on a test was not going to be received well by the medical community. Instead, we built a model where we offered genetic counseling to everyone who received a test. We learned that complete transparency of offering and simplicity of pricing were what consumers craved. Their in-clinic experience with insurance payments, co-pays and deductibles was often confusing and created barriers to adoption and consumer excellence. So, we worked to simplify these steps at every turn.Ease-of-use and customer convenience became our ethos.In addition, we sought out a relationship with Amazon to be the first genetic carrier screening testing company online with a complete care environment of the kind we were envisioning. We sent our test kits to brand managers at Amazon in Seattle to gain feedback on our process from beginning to end. We didnt want to just put test kits online. We wanted to get Amazons feedback on what they liked and what they didnt- and they were brutally honest wi th us (which is exactly what we needed).They liked that we offered testing in a care environment with physician ordering, counseling, and clear, understandable pricing. But they also told us that our reports to patients were too complicated. We were used to reporting to fertility clinics and physicians. To succeed in the online world to consumers, Amazon told us we had to completely overhaul our reports to make them consumer-friendly. And overhaul we did.It took time and a lot of effort but was essential to our success. In other words, we held ourselves up to critique in every way we could think of BEFORE we started the path to broad execution.3. Once youve surveyed the landscape, start looking for the simplest solutionYou dont have to reinvent the wheel in order to be disruptive.Once we took a hard look at the other offerings for testing online, we knew we could do better and go far beyond transactional online health. We knew our best shot at achieving this goal was to see the worl d through the eyes of our customer- not through the eyes of our technology platform alone.In our case, the opportunity to deliver better health online meant going beyond just the genetic testing piece. For those who dont know, the online testing world is a bit of the Wild West. Many companies offer broad panels of tests in a lot of areas of human health in a one-size-fits-all approach, regardless of what medical guidelines may recommend. Many do this without the care of a physician and without pre- and post-test counseling. In other words, consumers are left to figure things out for themselves, in a digital environment of transactional care.But why should consumers receive a different standard of care online than they get at the doctors office? The opportunity for disruption here was obvious and long overdue.Unfortunately, finding the simplest solution to your customers problems is actually the hardest part of creating a successful disruption.Steve Jobs once said, Simple can be hard er than complex You have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple. But its worth it in the end because once you get there, you can move mountains.Once you get the simple solution defined, then you then have to do the hard work of converting your plans into a successful path in order to move those mountains- and fifty different management teams will approach the same set of facts in fifty different ways.Which teams get things right depends on the depth of planning on the front end. And it also depends on which teams understand their customers best and deliver on the tough execution needed to succeed.4. We have a saying among our management team at Atlas Genetics Eat the Frog FirstWe didnt invent the phrase, but we love it and we live it.It means doing the hardest thing that needs to be done in the day, first. If youre willing to eat a frog first thing in the morning, everything after that is going to be easier.It means sitting down and creating a business plan before booking the flight for your next conference. It means doing the things that may take the hardest introspection and detailed work, but are essential to getting your idea to one day become disruptive.Unfortunately, a lot of people avoid the frogs in business. They start with, I think I have a great idea. How do I get this to market quickly before someone does it first? Ask the founders of MySpace, Blockbuster, or Nokia if being first was the most important thing. Planning is everything.Success is 99% execution.This post was originally published on Quora.com.

Saturday, November 23, 2019

How Innovators Choose Their Next Career Move Take Notes

How Innovators Choose Their Next Career Move Take NotesHow Innovators Choose Their Next Career Move - Take Notes What do online financial services, commercial spacecraft, and mass-market electric cars all have in common? Other than being industries shaped by serial entrepreneur Elon Musk , not a whole lot.What prompted Musk to choose to veer from PayPal to SpaceX, to Tesla? For that matter, what makes anybody choose the next move in their career?Dashun Wang , an associate professor of management and organizations at the Kellogg School, wondered if such seemingly mercurial choices could be modeled scientifically. Musk, whom Wang considers his personal hero, may be an extreme case. But every serial entrepreneur, artist, or scientist- that is, anyone whose job involves discovery, experimentation, and deciding what to work on next- thrives on seeking out new challenges.And understanding how professional innovators move from project to project has implications beyond th e merely philosophical.If we know individually how these people tend to change direction, then that determines collectively where things are going, Wang says.So how do innovative people choose their next career move? Is it really as random as it often seems?Wang, who is also a faculty member at the Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems , is used to tackling questions that might seem too ambiguous to yield to quantitative analysis. Were the unreasonable optimists, Wang says. We figured that theres got to be some pattern that we can document.Lets first understand how ur interests change during the course of our careers- then we can debate about what the best strategy is for making those changes.Wang and his coauthors Tao Jia of Southwest University in China and Boleslaw K. Szymanski of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute began by narrowing their investigation to one particular domain of innovators physicists.This scientific community uses a detailed set of numerical codes- the Physic s and Astronomy Classification Scheme (PACS)- to define research topics, much like the Dewey Decimal System uses numbers to categorize the subject matter of library books. The researchers used these codes to analyze how the work of the approximately 10,000 physicists in the database changed from project to project.We realized that theres a remarkable amount of regularity in what we choose to do next in our careers, Wang says.Several trends emerged from their analysis. The first is that most physicists research stayed relatively constrained within particular disciplines or domains.What this means is that most people- even innovators- dont change as much as they conceivably could, explains Wang, who holds a PhD in physics himself.When researchers did shift to a new project, it tended to be one that was very close to a previous project in terms of what Wang calls knowledge space.But which previous project? Somewhat unexpectedly, according to the data, the physicists most recent project s exerted the most dominant influence on what project they chose next.According to Wang, the physicists decisions go against a common intuition about innovators decision-making. That idea posits that the more time is spent moving in one direction, the further one gets ahead of the competition, and the more incentive there is to choose new projects that align with that initial direction. If physicists were trying to maximize their hard-won knowledge about that topic, they would double down on projects in similar domains as their earliest efforts.So your fourth project should more likely be similar to your first project than your third, Wang says.Instead, he says, what we find in the data is the other way around. If you study something, the next topic you study is predominantly determined by what you studied last- not what you studied first.This recency effect likely applies even to apparent outliers like Musk. Take his latest venture a startup called Neuralink , specializing in brai ncomputer interface technology with the goal of allowing menschenwrdig brains to keep up with artificial intelligence. It seems wholly unrelated to Musks prior successes with online payments, electric cars, and rocketry. However, one of Musks lesser-known projects- a nonprofit research company called OpenAI , focusing on artificial intelligence- does share clear similarities with Neuralink. Musks involvement in OpenAI began just two years before he launched Neuralink.Still, while Wangs model sheds new light on how innovators choose their next projects, it doesnt speak to how they should choose- both to move forward an entire field and their own careers.Lets first understand how our interests change during the course of our careers- then we can debate about what the best strategy is for making those changes, says Wang.Previously published in Kellogg Insight . Reprinted with permission of the Kellogg School of Management.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Network Administrator Job and Salary

Network Administrator Job and SalaryNetwork Administrator Job and SalaryIf you like working with both hardware and software, and enjoy managing others, becoming a network administrator is a great career choice.CIOs in a Robert Half Technology survey said network administration was one of the top three skill sets in greatest demand.And the Bureau of Labor Statistics projects employment of network administrators will increase through 2024, with demand for those working in computer systems design and related services projected to grow as much as 31 percent.Why? Systems and networks are the backbone of any company. As companies grow, their networks get larger and more complex, which raises the demand for people to support them.You can use our Salary Calculator to find out what network administrator salaries are in your city.Network administrator job descriptionHere are the essential qualifications for network administratorsSolid technical skills and experience with a variety of network p rotocols, software and hardware involved in LAN and WAN operations.Strong troubleshooting analytic and diagnostic skills, along with good communication abilities.Often requires individuals to be on call 24/7 in case of network failures or emergencies.A bachelors degree in computer science or information systems some companies will accept candidates with five or more years of work experience, as well as IT certifications offered by Cisco, Microsoft and others.Strong attention to detail and customer-service orientation, as well as the ability to work on a team.A typical network administrator job description includesAdministering the operation of LAN/WAN-related network services according to company policies and proceduresCoordinating and implementing network software and hardware upgradesTroubleshooting and resolving LAN/WAN performance, connectivity and related network problemsAdministering LAN/WAN security, antivirus and spam control measuresWanted great communicator whos calm under pressureIn addition to the skills listed above, the best network administrators have excellent written and verbal communication skills They need the ability to clearly articulate issues to other team members, and they should also have the ability to multi-task and have a calm demeanor in high-stress environments.While those looking to break into the field will need the technical and educational qualifications mentioned above, as well as relevant IT certifications, there are other options. Programs such as Year Up work to provide young adults with the training and experience they need to break into fields like this one.In addition to information on a starting network administrator salary and job description, youll find starting compensation for 70 IT jobs in 150 North American cities in our Salary Guide.This post has been updated to reflect more current information.